the Jenkins case is necessary to reconcile the Eighth Cir-cuit's interpretation of . Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. 4735 Missouri v. Jenkins, No. Contents 88-64. response brief of respondents juliana, et al., to petitioners' application for a stay pending disposition of a petition for a writ of mandamus to the united states district court for the district of oregon and any further proceedings in this court and request for an administrative stay julia a. olson counsel of record (osb no. Seventy-seven percent of one-thousand-eight-hundred legal . 1988. 1437.The U.S. Supreme Court held that in setting a reasonable attorney's fee under 28 U.S.C 1988, a legal fee may include a charge for legal assistant services at market rates rather than actual cost to the attorneys. 1983, the District Court found that the Kansas City, Missouri, School District (KCMSD) and petitioner State had operated a segregated school system within the KCMSD. . Office of General Counsel. Notes. Thus, the Court's 1990 judgment in Missouri v. Jenkins II Uenkins II) surprised many legal observers. in 1990, found that there was a statistically significant disparity between the "dollar value" of subcontracts awarded to minority-owned firms and those awarded to nonminority-owned The following are excerpts from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Missouri v. Jenkins. THE HONORABLE MITCHELL J. METROPULOS PRESIDING . A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE JENKINS LITIGATION 617 A. Rule of Law 19831, the District Court found that the Kansas City, Missouri, School District and petitioner State had operated a segregated school system within the KCMSD. Register here. S. R. AAB. On June 12, 1995 the Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned a district court ruling that required the state of Missouri to correct intentional racial discrimination in Kansas City schools by funding salary increases and remedial education programs. Syllabus by the Court In an action under 42 U.S.C. 1985), aff'd as modified, 807 F.2d 657 (8th Cir. The Taylors sued the Insurers, and on June 2, 1992, recovered judgment on a jury verdict. Supreme Court of United States. 88-1150 Argued Oct. 30, 1989 Decided April 18, 1990 495 U.S. 33 Syllabus In an action under 42 U.S.C. Jun 12, 1995. 5 Argued January 11, 1995. i DISCLOSURE STATEMENT No amici is a subsidiary of any parent company. 20685) Solicitor General of Louisiana MISSOURI et al. Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement - April 18, 1990 in Missouri v. Jenkins. As a result of Missouri v. Jenkins . Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-. The applicants cite Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 109 S.Ct. The Hope School District case originated more than thirty years ago. APRIL J. ANDERSON . Argued February 21, 1989 Decided June 19, 1989. Reina, Chief of Police, Salt River Department of Public Safety, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, et al. The United States Supreme Court has also confirmed that billable time for paralegals is a legitimate fee. MISSOURI V. JENKINS AND THE DE FACTO ABANDONMENT OF COURT-ENFORCED DESEGREGATION Bradley W. Joondeph* Abstract: It has been forty-three years since the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education. Attorneys . The District Court certified the class after realigning the school board as a nominal defendant. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of any amici's stock. DOCKET NO. 495 U.S. 33 (1990), argued 30 Oct. 1989, decided 18 Apr. Missouri argued that these orders went beyond the court's authority. Plaintiffs alleged that the State, the surrounding suburban school districts (SSD's), and [ MISSOURI v. The trial lasted 7.5 months with a finding of segregation and the failure to eliminate the system that caused it. In Missouri v. Jenkins, 29 the Supreme Court approved the power of the federal courts to authorize the imposition of a local tax and then give effect to that increase by enjoining the operation of a state law which would have limited such tax. Information about the facts of the case, issues, and conclusion of the Court in Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 US 33 (1990). In this Article, the author argues that the Court's recent decision, Missouri v. 0 Shares . May it please the Court: MISSOURI, et al., Petitioners v. Kalima JENKINS et al. All State & Fed. DECIDED: Jun 19, 1989. NATIONAL CASES. Cert. v. STATE OF LOUISIANA; R. KYLE ARDOIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF LOUISIANA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Defendants-Appellants. Source United States, 493 U.S. 265, 277-80 (1990) (holding that injunction requiring municipal legislators to enact voted-on ordinance was abuse of discretion in light of importance of their legislative function); Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33, 50-51 (1990) (holding that courts cannot directly levy state or municipal taxes, although they may . In considering the timeliness of a motion to intervene, a court must consider the totality of the . It also marks the Court's departure from broad, aggressive federal court remedies to provide equal education opportunities in public schools. BRIEF AND APPENDIX OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT . R 4:45-7:15American Constitutional Law Case Briefs 9/27/12 Mistretta v. United States Citation. As a segregation remedial order, a federal court ordered Missouri (Defendant) to fund raises for teachers and staff in the Kansas City Metropolitan School District and to fund magnet programs. 1410 San Francisco, CA 94104 (628) 231-2500 vic . AND AN ORDER DENYING A MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE . CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. </p> <p>The District Court therefore abused its discretion in imposing the tax itself. A-3. JENNIFER A. JENKINS, Defendant - Appellant. In this major school desegregation litigation in Kansas City, Missouri, in which various desegregation remedies were granted against the State of Missouri and other defendants, the . SUPPORTING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND URGING REVERSAL _____ CHARLES P. ROSE THOMAS E. PEREZ . ADVOCATES: Bruce Farmer - Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, argued the cause for the petitioners. M. ICHAEL . 2d 256, 58 U.S.L.W. 93-1823. Griffin v. Pet. V. S. TURGILL . Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 109 S.Ct. 2463, 105 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989). See Jenkins v. Missouri, 639 F. Supp. The decision in Missouri v. Jenkins was important because it. All Legal Terms; Family & Estate Planning; Business & Real Estate; Civil Law; Criminal Law 3258 (U.S. Oct. 16, 1989) Brief Fact Summary. As a remedy for segregation in the Kansas City, Missouri, school district, the district court ordered a "magnet school" plan to attract suburban students back to the inner city schoolscomplete with a planetarium, a twenty . In the landmark case of Missouri v. Jenkins, the US Supreme Court decided that attorney fee awards under a federal statute: Could include paralegal time at market rates. jenkins, 495 u.s. 33, missouri challenges the district court's orders requiring the state (1) to fund salary increases for virtually all instructional and noninstructional staff within the kansas city, missouri, school district (kcmsd), and (2) to continue to fund remedial "quality education" programs because student achievement levels were still Citation Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4885, 493 U.S. 916, 110 S. Ct. 275, 107 L. Ed. Citing Cases. 488 U.S. 361, 109 S. Ct. 647, 102 L. Ed. BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE. and Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles. Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 276 (1989) (Jenkins I). Department . In Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 109 S. Ct. 2463, 105 L. Ed. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33 (1990) Facts: In an action under 42 U.S.C. Media. 1961(a) with the principles established in this Court's decision in" Kaiser Alumninuma & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno, 110 S. Ct. 1570 (1990). 88-1150. Questions the implications for future democratic government. The Original Finding on Liability and Remedial Orders 618 B. The district court denied fees on the theory that, since the Supreme . On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon (No. Liab. Missouri v. Jenkins 495 U.S. 33 (1990) MISSOURI ET AL. Information about the facts of the case, issues, and conclusion of the Court in Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 US 33 (1990). Oral Argument - January 11, 1995; Opinion Announcement - June 12, 1995; Opinions. Missouri Respondent Jenkins Docket no. 1990 by vote of 9 to 0; White for the Court, Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, and Scalia, concurring. Read Jenkins v. Missouri, 78 F.3d 1270, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . Section 1988 provides that "the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a . 4, March 2004 1 Marzo 2004 State Bar No. Most recently, this case was the subject of a petition for writ of certiorari filed by the same group of would-be intervenors in Clark v. Jenkins, No. United States William and Mary Law Review Vol. B, Pet. DECIDED BY: Rehnquist Court (1988-1990) LOWER COURT: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. swann v. charlotte mechlenberg board of education, (1971) (busing) missouri v jenkins (1995) (implementation) regents of the university of california v. baake (1978) grutter san antonio school district v rodriguez,(1973) ($$$,taxes and schools) craig v. boren,(1976) (3.2 beer) michael m. v superior court, (1981) (statutory rape) korematsu v. u . In . Citation 515 US 70 (1995) Argued. Jenkins v. Missouri. Maintains that elected representatives placate interest groups and abdicate power in favor of the courts when political decisions are unpopular. Title U.S. Reports: Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995). JX. EPA con cluded that it lacked authority to undertake such regulation under the CAA. 6 Decided June 12, 1995. 88-1150. Justice White, writing for the majority, held that a federal court could compel such tax increases only by enjoining obstructive state stat-utes or ordering local authorities to exercise their own taxing au-thority . Missouri v. Jenkins (Jenkins II) United States Supreme Court 495 U.S. 33 (1990) Facts The Kansas City, Missouri, School District (the district) (plaintiff) and a group of students (plaintiffs) sued Missouri (defendant) in 1977 for maintaining a segregated school system in violation of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). App. Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Counsel of Record . In the subsequent Hope con- Legal Dictionary. Save Paper; 5 . case. S. URI. APPELLANTS' OPENING BRIEF Counsel for Defendants-Appellants JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK Assistant Attorney General ERIC GRANT Deputy Assistant Attorney General ANDREW C. MERGEN SOMMER H. ENGELS ROBERT J. LUNDMAN Attorneys Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 7415 Washington, D.C. 20044 (202) 514-0943 eric.grant@usdoj.gov Case: 18-36082, 02/01/2019 . Source Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33 (1990) Missouri v. Jenkins No. Though this ruling r v reynolds 1988 case summary. See Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U. S. 33, 57 (1990); Liddell v. Missouri, 731 F. 2d 1294, 1320 (CA8 1984) (en banc); cf. In re Uponor, Inc., F1807 Plumbing Fittings Prods. In a 5-4 ruling, the Court upheld in Jenkins II the authority of the federal judiciary to impose a tax increase to fund the remedy in a formerly dual system. FRANCISCO LOPEZ SAMUEL R. BAGENSTOS . Please read the selection from Missouri v. Jenkins (1990) ("Jenkins II"). BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE . COTTLE | PASQUALE | LABORDE, s.c. Stephanie M. Rock . Jan 11, 1995. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33, 76, 110 S. Ct. 1651, 1676, 109 L. Ed. 45 Nbr. 2463, 105 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989): subsequent negative appellate history at 731 F.Supp. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE Mosaic - (301) 927-3800 - Cheverly, MD Dana P. Moore Baltimore City Law Department 100 N. Holliday Street, Suite 109 Baltimore, MD 21202 VIcTor M. Sher Counsel of Record MaTThew K. eDlIng MIchael Burger MarTIn D. QuIoneS QuenTIn c. KarPIlow Sher Edling LLP 100 Montgomery St., Ste. GREGORY B. FRIEL . Examines present lack of judicial restraint by analyzing "Missouri v. Jenkins," a case upholding a court-ordered tax increase to fund school desegregation. In Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33 (1990), for instance, the Supreme Court held that a federal district court could desegregate public schools by authorizing the school distric.. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A police officer found two individuals in a car parked on the side of a highway. NOEL J. FRANCISCO Solicitor General . The Law Dictionary for Everyone. . Case No. 3. v. JENKINS et al. The underlying case started in 1977 when the school board and two children of school board members brought suit against the State and other defendants alleging racial segregation. Jenkins, 495 US 33 (1990). 7. The officer thought he smelled alcohol on one of the individual's breath and began . denied, 484 U.S. 816 (1987) ("Segregation has caused a system wide reduction in student achievement in the schools of the KCMSD."). angela west biography. In a 5-4 ruling, the Court upheld in Jenkins II the authority of the federal judiciary to impose a tax increase to fund the remedy in a formerly dual system. 6:15-cv-01517-AA) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES' ANSWERING BRIEF JULIA A. OLSON Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. at 288, Note 10, 109 S. Ct. at 2472, Note 10. In 1990, the parties agreed to settle that case. V. IVEK . L. OWELL . 1030 CALIFORNIA LAW . Case Name: Missouri v. Jenkins 491 U.S. 274 (1989) United States Supreme Court Facts: The attorneys and associates for plaintiff Kansas City Missouri School District had been litigating a school district segregation case since 1979 and NAACP had been litigating the case since 1982. No. Contributor Names Rehnquist, William H. (Judge) Supreme Court of the United States (Author) 19-479-JWD-SDJ OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS Elizabeth Murrill (La. General Counsel Assistant Attorney General . No. Plaintiffs, the Taylors, were insured under a homeowner's insurance policy issued by defendant Northwestern, which is one of defendant Chubb's group of companies. Sign Up Get a Demo Get a Demo. In school desegregation cases, as a last resort, federal courts have asserted authority to direct the imposition of, or increase in, local tax levies, even in amounts exceeding the ceiling set by state law. 2d 229 (1989), we considered whether litigants could recover paralegal fees under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Opinion Case details. Mo. 1986), cert. In this major school desegregation litigation in Kansas City, Missouri, in which various desegregation remedies were granted against the State of Missouri and other defendants, the plaintiff class was represented by a Kansas City lawyer (Benson) and by the NAACP Legal Defense and . In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that the district court could not raise taxes directly, but court . 88-1150 Decided by Rehnquist Court Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Citation 495 US 33 (1990) Argued Oct 30, 1989 Decided Apr 18, 1990 Advocates Allen R. Snyder Argued the cause for the respondents H. Bartow Farr, III Argued the cause for the petitioners Facts of the case and Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles. In Missouri v Jenkins,' the United States Supreme Court ruled five to four that a federal court may impose a local property tax increase to finance school desegregation remedies. 92-69. Petitioners contend that the distinction made in Bonjorno between . 11 In Missouri v. Jenkins, the court also noted the results of a survey by Amicus, National Association of Legal Assistants, the [874 P.2d 809] organization to which the legal assistant in this appeal belongs. June 10, 2021 /s/ Caleb C. Wolanek Of Counsel Case: 21-55395, 06/10/2021, ID: 12140103, DktEntry: 38, Page 2 of 48 Decided April 18, 1990. This final iteration of the Missouri v. Jenkins cases (this case is deemed Missouri v. Jenkins III) marks the end of the Court's involvement in the 18-year-long litigation. 2d 31 (1990) (Kennedy, J., concurring) ("The plaintiffs and KCMSD might well be seen as parties that have joined forces apparently for the purpose of extracting funds from the state treasury.") (internal quotations omitted). Thus, the Court's 1990 judgment in Missouri v. Jenkins II Uenkins II) surprised many legal observers. 1" `Magnet schools,' as generally understood, are public schools of voluntary enrollment designed to promote integration by drawing students away from their neighborhoods and private schools through distinctive curricula and high quality."Missouri v.Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33, 40, n. 6 (1990).. 2 In April 1993, 16 years after this litigation began, the District Court acknowledged that the . Connecting the dots: Grutter, school desegregation, and federalism. "M, Missouri v. Jenkins (1990)," published on by Oxford University Press. 93-1823 . STATES' BRIEF REGARDING REHEARING EN BANC ROBERT W. FERGUSON, WSBA 26004 Attorney General of Washington NOAH G. PURCELL, WSBA 43492 Solicitor General ANNE E. EGELER, WSBA 20258 Deputy Solicitor General COLLEEN M. MELODY, WSBA 42275 Civil Rights Unit Chief MARSHA CHIEN, WSBA 47020 PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ, WSBA 47693 Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General 800 Fifth Avenue . 06-1717 richlin security service company, petitioner v. michael chertoff, secretary of homeland security on petition for a writ of certiorari to the united sta tes co ur t of appeals - Description: U.S. Reports Volume 495; October Term, 1989; Duro v. Reina, Chief of Police, Salt River Department of Public Safety, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, et al. 4. Thousands of fee awards that included market-level compensation . APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CIVIL ACTION NO. No. 062230, csb no. As part of the process of court-ordered desegregation of the Kansas City, Missouri school system, a federal district court in Missouri ordered a local tax increase in order to fund the costs of desegregation. Jay Topkis - argued the cause for the . Litig. 1991); App. Check out our top Free Essays on Missouri V Jenkins to help you write your own Essay . Respondent Jenkins et al. Jenkins, 495 US 33 (1990). Assistant to the Solicitor General . 0 . The attorneys and paralegals are entitled to compensation under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976. denied, 487 U. S. 1206 (1988). In 1988, a group of employees and students filed that case alleging "racial discrim-ination regarding Hope's treatment of African American students and faculty." ADD19. Argued Oct. 30, 1989. Mr. Farr? In Missouri v. Jenkins, the Supreme Court held that an attorney recovering fees under a federal Section 1988 can also bill separately at market rate and be compensated for the services of paralegals. Brief Fact Summary. 1029. 8 [72] [72] Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined. </p> <p>The District Court therefore abused its discretion in imposing the tax itself. The U.S. Supreme Court initially concluded in Jenkins II, 495 U.S. 33 (1990), that the district court should have enjoined state tax laws that interfered with the district's compliance with Brown, rather than order an increase in local property taxes. 19, 24 (W.D. Provided an incentive for lawyers to use paralegal services. <p>Other Circuits routinely treat documents so labeled as containing only suggestions for rehearing in banc. <p>Other Circuits routinely treat documents so labeled as containing only suggestions for rehearing in banc. Other Circuits that have faced funding problems . Only 26% of KCMSD students are white. EPA denied a rulemaking petition seeking regulation, pursuant to Section 202 (a) (1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), 42 U.S.C. The plaintiffs in the Kansas City school desegregation case appeal the district court's order denying them an award of attorneys' fees for their participation in the proceedings in the Supreme Court that culminated in Missouri v. Jenkins, 115 S. Ct. 2038 (1995) (Jenkins III). This Court denied the petition for WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court yesterday declined to review a federal appeals court ruling in a case that some bank and securities executives complain could lead to a flood of so-called fraud-by-hind-sight cases. Docket no. 88-64 United States Supreme Court June 19, 1989. These unique facts produced a unique (and thus "unprecedented"), but not unprincipled, result. del. at 6. Paul . Jenkins v Missouri, 931 F.2d 1273 (8th Cir. APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION . The fact that a . Bar Roll No. 2463, 105 L.Ed.2d 229, 57 U.S.L.W. United States Supreme Court. v. JENKINS ET AL. Argued October 30, 1989 Decided April 18, 1990 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT [36] H. Bartow Farr III argued the cause for petitioners. The attorneys and paralegals are entitled to compensation under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976. denied, 487 U. S. 1206 (1988). Other Circuits that have faced funding problems . The . The Taylors' home was destroyed by fire on January 7, 1990. : 1117723 . The case, UJB Financial Corp. v. Shapiro, arose after the bank's stock value declined . The KCMSD Litigation, 1987-1994 622 C. The Supreme Court's Decision in Jenkins 625 IV. Decided by Rehnquist Court . 3 No. H. Bartow Farr, III: Thank you, Mr. Chief Justice. Patricia King, When Desegregation Backfires, NEWSWEEK, July 31, 1989, at 56. 30 The Court rejected the argument that the funding order invaded the state's domain of reserved non . Syllabus ; View Case ; Petitioner Missouri et al. EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitor General . Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit . 7521 (a) (1), of emissions of carbon dioxide and three other so- called "greenhouse gases" from new motor vehicles. At issue was an ambitious desegregation order requiring salary increases for teachers and staff in the Kansas City school district and the continued funding of an extensive remedial . Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 205300001- SupremeCtBriefs @usdoj.gov . : 88-64. SIGNS IN THE REASONING: THE IMPLICIT MESSAGE OF JENKINS 627 A. Conceptualizing "Interdistrict Remedy" Expansively .630 B. Stretching to Hold That the District Court's . 1983, the District Court found that the Kansas City, Missouri, School District (KCMSD) and petitioner State had operated a segregated school system within the KCMSD. 2d 714 (1989) Summary: John M. Mistretta (Petitioner) took the United States to court over the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 adopted by congress because. Attorney Principal Deputy Assistant . Missouri v. Jenkins. Advocates. Though this ruling Attorneys asked and received reasonable attorney fees . Decided. JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General . U.S. Department of Education Attorney General . In that year, the KCMSD, the school board, and the children of two school board members brought suit against the State and other defendants. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a young adult incompetent.The first "right to die" case ever heard by the Court, Cruzan was argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990.In a 5-4 decision, the Court affirmed the earlier ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri and . J. R. Attorneys . 192642) wild earth advocates 1216 lincoln st . ENTERED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR OUTAGAMIE COUNTY . October 14, 1992, 1:00 a.m. EDT 5 Min Read. William H. Rehnquist: We'll hear argument first this morning in Number 88-1150, Missouri v. Kalima Jenkins. CITATION: 491 US 274 (1989) ARGUED: Feb 21, 1989. 18-36082 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. MISSOURI v. JENKINS 515 U.S. 70 (1995)inMissouri v. Jenkins, the Supreme Court considered once again the limits on the type of relief that a federal district court judge can order in a school desegregation case. Attorney for Defendant-Appellant . no. [7] While permissible, however, the Court . MISSOURI v. JENKINS 495 U.S. 33 (1990) Jenkins produced a unanimous result but with two sharply differing opinions on an important question concerning the power of federal courts to remedy school desegregation. This case has previously been the subject of an opinion of this Court, Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33 (1990). Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989) 109 S.Ct. Subsequently, the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed two remedial issues. In that civil rights case the court Clearly, compensation received several years after the service.. Request a trial to view additional results 18 books & journal articles